<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Event-Sourcing on All about Raspberry Pi</title><link>https://hugozhu.site/tags/event-sourcing/</link><description>Recent content in Event-Sourcing on All about Raspberry Pi</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hugozhu.site/tags/event-sourcing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>一切皆插件：DeepSeek Harness 真正硬核的是三个细节</title><link>https://hugozhu.site/post/2026/348-dsh-three-details-reversible-effects/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://hugozhu.site/post/2026/348-dsh-three-details-reversible-effects/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;前天写 &lt;a href="https://hugozhu.site/post/2026/347-deepseek-harness-convergence-gap/"&gt;一切皆插件：DeepSeek Harness 的野心与收敛鸿沟&lt;/a&gt; 时，我说 DeepSeek 开源的不是工具，是运行时。当时主要看的是官方页面和仓库门面。这两天陆续有人把整个仓库拉下来逐包分析，翻出来的东西比我想的更硬。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;其中有一份源码深扒（作者 @Ai 学习的老章，文末有出处）把 200 多个包从启动配置翻到 Agent Loop、事件管线、上下文压缩，再加上我自己读了一遍官方架构文档，发现「一切皆插件」这句话真正站得住，靠的不是插件数量，而是三个很容易被忽略的细节。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;这三个细节，恰好是「运行时」和「工具」的分界线。&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hugozhu.site/img/2026/dsh-three-details.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://hugozhu.site/img/2026/dsh-three-details-thumb.jpg" alt="Everything Is a Plugin: Three Details That Make DeepSeek Harness Real"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>